Amy Cooper Is Just Dealing With Consequences

In the ongoing hellscape known as reality, it was somehow a perfect encapsulation of 2020 to watch a random entitled white woman upgrade to her Ultimate Karen form by confronting, then attacking a Black man’s polite request with the promise of state-enforced violence. But while we were on the way to another boring episode of blameless white victimhood, something curious happened: consequences.

Let’s be honest: whenever the words “consequences” and “white” are part of the equation in this country, it’s usually a bad result for BIPOC (black, indigenous, and people of color). For pretty much ever, the costs of racism have been paid out by the victims. At any white whim, our lives could be disrupted, incarcerated or ended — without defense. Our homes, our jobs, our dreams: all of it could disappear in an instant, if it offended or obstructed the interests of white people. 

In previous decades, this was the price paid by Emmett Till and the Exonerated Five. And considering the long and recent list of names from Trayvon Martin and Renisha McBride to Atatiana Jefferson and George Floyd, not enough of that reality has changed.

It’s in that reality — the one where white discomfort is paid for in Black suffering — that Amy Cooper went viral. In the now ubiquitous video, Cooper escalated a simple dispute about basic decency (following the rules of Central Park) into a dramatic and theatrical performance of fragile white womanhood. Confronted about the lack of leash on her dog by avid birder and Black man, Christian Cooper (no relation), Amy took it into her head that the only appropriate response to this entirely reasonable demand was to act as if he had threatened to assault her and then call the police for her fake danger.

It was a moment of selfish, manipulative cruelty. It was an act of supreme and reflexive entitlement. It was a complete dick move. There was no redeeming value in her actions; nothing defensible or sympathetic. And in a rare move, reality agreed.

In about the time it takes to saturate Twitter feeds on Memorial Day, Amy Cooper had lost her job, her dog, and any shred of dignity. Former dog-walkers identified her; her employer disavowed her; her neighborhood rebuked her. As much as is possible in our divided age, we had consensus about the danger and the damage of Cooper’s actions, and moved to punish her for them. And in doing so, there was a validation of the perspectives and voices of Black people about the reality of our world and the nature of the pressures and threats we face. 

In the isolation of pandemic, we have had to face the calculated disregard for Black lives without the distraction of daily life to buffer the pain. Ahmaud Arbery; Breonna Taylor; the same-day murder of George Floyd: these stories illuminated the endangerment that Amy Cooper was happy to invoke in contrast to the trifling frustration of having her entitlement called out. And so, when her punishment came through, there wasn’t a lot of equivocation; there wasn’t a lot of rationalization; there wasn’t a lot of the same terrible excuses we’ve heard a thousand times. Finally, the same racist energy that upends lives and steals futures came right back on the woman who sent it out into the world.

And she did send it. As pointed out across the internet, Amy Cooper knew what history she was invoking when she called 911 and screamed for a cop to come immediately to deal with the African-American man “threatening” her and her dog. She wasn’t thoughtlessly reacting or overcome by fear; she knew the costs of racism — fear, intimidation, exclusion, exploitation and death — and was trying to force Christian Cooper to pay them. She just didn’t expect that it could apply to her.

In the big picture, it’s not wild for her to believe that either. In the same way that BIPOC have largely borne the weight of racism, white people have largely escaped consequences. Depending on the white person, they’ve even flourished. Donald Trump is President of the United States after open and visible support of white supremacists, including hiring them as advisors. In the middle of a pandemic, there’s still no coordinated federal response to the reality that Black and brown citizens are losing their lives at an alarming rate, nor that we are the populations most endangered by sloppy and irresponsible reopening plans

Culturally, Lana del Rey thinks she can throw shade at Beyoncé, while Colin Kaepernick entered yet another NFL season without a contract, as a guy with white supremacist tattoos celebrated getting drafted. If a well-off white lady in Central Park thinks that doing some racism is going to turn out ok for her, she’s usually right.

In another time, on another day, Amy Cooper could have done the same thing, and Christian Cooper would have had to survive the fallout. That’s how things usually go. That’s how things are for millions of Black people every day. Any given interracial interaction could cost us our whole lives, literally literally. 

Before it cost her a living, a pet, and a sense of peace, Amy Cooper was fine with using that existential terror for her own ends. In the viral video, she didn’t react with shame and self-reflection when caught breaking the rules; she got more aggressive and reactionary for being rightly challenged. And she was willing to make Christian Cooper pay for that discomfort with his life.

Fortunately, he didn’t have to. Fortunately, her vindictive desire to ruin his life rebounded to ruin her own. Amy Cooper deserves to bear the costs that she tried to force others to pay, and we deserve to live in a world that makes her. Maybe this is enough to make her reconsider the impulses that led her to think that any of that was ok.

But more importantly, maybe this is enough to make society itself reconsider who should suffer for racism. Because as much as Amy Cooper probably hates her life right now, at least she still has one.

(Images: Shutterstock/ Melody Cooper)

UPDATED: Army and Navy Students Did Not Have Racist Intent Using Hand Symbol At Football Game, Investigation Finds

UPDATE, DECEMBER 24: Investigations into whether West Point and the U.S. Naval Academy concluded that the Army Cadets and Navy Midshipmen suspected of flashing a white power symbol at cameras during a Navy-Army football game attended by President Trump has found the students did not have racist intent using the gestures.

“We investigated this matter thoroughly,” Lt. Gen. Darryl A. Williams, superintendent at the U.S. Military Academy, said in a statement.

“Last Saturday we had reason to believe these actions were an innocent game and not linked to extremism, but we must take allegations such as these very seriously. We are disappointed by the immature behavior of the cadets,” he added.

PREVIOUSLY:

Welp, it’s only Tuesday and I’ve already had to Google “history of white power hand gestures.”

God, this year has lasted forever. Anyway, I found myself doing this particularly unpleasant research after discovering that a couple of students were caught on camera giving a hand gesture that could be interpreted as a symbol for white supremacy at the Army-Navy football game in Philadelphia this weekend. The hand gesture in question is the “okay” sign, when one makes an ‘O’ and a ‘K’ with their fingers, traditionally used to signify consent, content, or satisfaction. However, the sign has obtained some other meanings over the years, including the symbol for ‘white power.’ Ya hate to see it.

pic.twitter.com/9u0s3Sgio0

— Looky Yonder (@YonderLooky) December 14, 2019

Two U.S. Military Academy cadets and a Naval Academy midshipman who were behind ESPN’s Rece Davis can be seen using the symbol. Both the Army and the Navy have launched internal investigations to decipher whether or not this incident was meant to promote white supremacy. Leave it to the Army and Navy to conduct their investigations internally, but I digress.

Cmdr. Alana Garas, a spokesperson for the Naval Academy, told The Washington Post: “Based on findings of the investigation, those involved will be held appropriately accountable. It would be inappropriate to speculate any further while we are conducting this investigation.”

So, what’s up for debate? The gesture used could have been meant for something else besides bigotry, such as its traditional use of “okay,” or the “circle game,” which you may remember from middle school, when kids would make the gesture somewhere below the waist and if you looked, they were “allowed” to punch your arm. Fun times.

So, maybe these Army/Navy students were simply playing a fun lil’ game that we all deserted when we were 12-years-old. Pretty immature to do on live television, or anywhere, but go off.

But there is also the chance that these guys were using the gesture to represent white power. And who do we have to thank for the new, offensive significance of this gesture? 4CHAN dot com. Why am I not surprised? According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a hoax started in 2017 (approx. 5,000 years ago) on 4CHAN is what started the new meaning of the ‘okay’ symbol. The idea was to promote the ‘okay’ gesture as a symbol for ‘wp’ or ‘white power’ as a joke, hoping it would outrage liberals, make media headlines, and get everybody all riled up for nothing.

However, the hoax was so successful that right-leaning people got in on the “joke” and started using the symbol. From there, white supremacists started using it sincerely, and it has since been seen in actual white power groups and the like. Cool joke.

On ADL’s website, they suggest: “Because of the traditional meaning of the ‘okay’ hand gesture, as well as other usages unrelated to white supremacy, particular care must be taken not to jump to conclusions about the intent behind someone who has used the gesture.”

So, I guess we will have to wait to see what these internal investigations find…

Want to keep up with the news without crying into your sad desk salad? Subscribe to the Betches Sup newsletter for a lunchtime briefing to make you laugh, instead of cry, about the news. 

Images: Twitter (1), Giphy (2)