Kim Kardashian’s Latest Photo Looks A Whole Lot Like Blackface

Well, well, well, if it isn’t Kim Kardashian West, getting called out yet again for doing something culturally insensitive. Throughout their years in the public eye, Kim and her sisters have often ended up in hot water for cultural appropriation, but based on Kim’s latest photoshoot, it appears that she’s yet to learn her lesson. Actually, at this point it seems like she knows full well what cultural appropriation is and what might constitute it, she just doesn’t give a flying f*ck.

Whatever the case may be, on Thursday afternoon, Kim Kardashian posted photos on Instagram from her cover shoot for the new issue of 7HOLLYWOOD magazine. If you’ve never heard of 7HOLLYWOOD, you’re definitely not alone. The magazine, which only has 28,000 followers on Instagram, is described as “an LA based biannual fashion, celebrity and art magazine.” It appears that it’s been around for a few years, and based on the fact that they can get Kim for their cover, I’d guess that it’s backed by someone with a lot of money and/or connections. But I digress, because that’s not really what matters here.

When I’ve talked to people about these photos, nearly every single person’s first reaction was “uh…Kim looks black.” And for the people who didn’t think this, it’s only because they literally thought it was a photo of a black woman, not Kim at all. I’ve heard Diana Ross, Angela Bassett, Diahann Carroll—a who’s who of beautiful, famous black women. But no, it’s a photo of good old Kim, looking more tan than ever.

View this post on Instagram

Wearing Mugler Private Archives for @7hollywood_mag. ✨✨✨ WHAT A DREAM ✨✨✨ Art Direction by @manfredthierrymugler. Photographed by @alixmalka Styled by @maryammalakpour Make Up @makeupbymario Hair @peter.savic Video @sunset_edit

A post shared by Kim Kardashian West (@kimkardashian) on

What makes this whole thing even more confusing is that the inspiration for this shoot wasn’t even a black woman—it was apparently supposed to an homage to Elizabeth Taylor, who was decidedly white. It would be a bad look either way, but there’s truly no logical reason why they would even want to make her look so tan here. Do these people not know that they can just like… not? There is no reason for this sh*t to even happen!

While Kim’s sisters commented on the pics saying how gorg she looks, the normal, sensible people of the internet were less impressed. Basically my entire Twitter feed was people discussing Kim’s potential use of blackface, and there are already articles and think pieces all over the internet about the photos. My personal favorite headline comes from Bossip.comwho really just summed up what we were all thinking, if we could all think in hilarious rhymes:

As someone who spends a fair amount of time trying to think of interesting and catchy headlines, this is so f*cking good. It’s hilarious from start to finish, but also 100% accurate. Meanwhile, the folks over at Us Weekly had a slightly different take, gushing that “Kim Kardashian Channels Elizabeth Taylor” in the magazine shoot, also reiterating that they’re “living for it.” I mean, talk about failing to read the room. First of all, Elizabeth Taylor was famously very pale, but that’s not even the issue here.

Basically the entire internet is dragging Kim Kardashian to filth for these photos, but UsWeekly completely missed the point. Instead of coming up with a meaningful take, or even just taking a temperature on the situation, they basically just put out a glorified press release celebrating Kim Kardashian. Like, is Kris Jenner paying their salaries? Talk about a swing and a miss.

So far, Kim hasn’t commented at all on the controversy over the photos, but I’m expecting her to say something sooner or later. Even though this sh*t happens with her over and over again, she’s the kind of person who usually backtracks or makes some kind of statement so people won’t be mad at her. She’ll probably say the lighting did something weird, or her spray tan developed more than she was expecting, and remind us that she has a black husband and kids. Better than nothing, I guess, but don’t expect any real change from her.

If that sounds harsh, it’s only because we’ve been here before. It was just six months ago when Kim got ~dragged to the appropriation station~ when she unveiled her new shapewear collection. As you may recall, Kim went with the punny, but tragically ill-advised name of “KIMONO,” which, well, you know how that went down. After Kim was criticized by the entire internet and in an actual letter from the Japanese government, and she quickly backed down. She retitled the collection “Skims,” which is still a great pun, and the eventual launch was very successful. According to TMZ sources, Skims has been selling so well that it could turn out to be Kim’s billion-dollar business idea. Sure, it cost her time and money to rebrand the collection, but overall, she didn’t really experience any major negative consequences for her major f*ckup—which to me indicates that she has no real incentive to be more sensitive in the future.

Another ~appropriation station~ moment happened last year, when Kim got taken to task for appropriating a traditional African hairstyle. The choice of hairstyle was touchy in the first place, but she made things worse by describing them in a story as “Bo Derek braids.” In case you’re unaware, Bo Derek is a white woman who had this hairstyle back in the 70s.

View this post on Instagram

#PressPlay: #TSRHairDosAndDonts–#Kimberly is out here in her formation braids 👀👀 is she serving #Roommates?!! #KimKardashian

A post shared by The Shade Room (@theshaderoom) on

Too bad they’re actually called Fulani braids, after an African culture that’s been doing them for centuries. After the fact, Kim claimed that she knows this, and she said the understands the backlash. At an interview last year at her KKW Beauty popup, she said “I’m totally respectful of that. I’m not tone deaf to where I don’t get it. I do get it.” Okay but like… do you? Kim said that a main reason she got the hairstyle was that her daughter wanted to match with her, but the whole “Bo Derek braids” caption has nothing to do with that.

So as you can see, this isn’t the first time Kim Kardashian has dipped her toes into cultural waters where she doesn’t really belong, and I would bet all $5 the money sitting in my 401(k) that it won’t be the last. The jury is still out on whether she’ll actually address this controversy, but at this point, does it even really matter? No matter how sincere an apology sounds, if you just continue the same behaviors you get called out for over and over again, people eventually stop believing you. Kim could still change, and I’ll never say never, but I won’t hold my breath either.

Images: KimKardashian, theshaderoom / Instagram;

Gucci Is In Trouble For Another Culturally Insensitive Design

No one said being a fashion designer was easy, but there’s one basic rule that really shouldn’t be that hard to remember: try not to piss off an entire religious/cultural/ethnic group. It seems pretty obvious that cultural appropriation isn’t cool in 2019, but apparently the people over at Gucci have forgotten…for the second time this year.

A few months ago, Gucci raised some major eyebrows when white male models in their Milan Fashion Week show were wearing turbans as accessories on the runway. There’s nothing wrong with wearing a hat, but people were upset that the accessories closely resembled the dastaar, the turbans worn by those in the Sikh religion. The turbans, which have deep significance in the Sikh faith, have been worn for hundreds of years.

Dear @gucci, the Sikh Turban is not a hot new accessory for white models but an article of faith for practising Sikhs. Your models have used Turbans as ‘hats’ whereas practising Sikhs tie them neatly fold-by-fold. Using fake Sikhs/Turbans is worse than selling fake Gucci products

— Harjinder Singh Kukreja (@SinghLions) May 16, 2019

People were already upset about the accessories being worn on the runway, but last week, the turbans went up for sale on the Nordstrom website. Officially called the “Indy Full Turban”, the retail price was a casual $790. Yikes. Aside from the look of the turban, it’s an extremely bad look to rip off an Indian religion and then call the item “Indy.” I have many, many questions about how anyone at Gucci thought this was a good idea, let alone the dozens of people who must have approved this before it made it to the racks at Nordstrom.

This is beyond aggravating. Did someone at @gucci even bother to figure out what a dastaar (turban) means to Sikhs? Did it cross your minds to consider the history behind our identity? My people are discriminated against, even killed, for wearing a turban.

— Aasees Kaur (@SouthernSikh) May 14, 2019

Like I mentioned before, this isn’t even the first time in 2019 that Gucci has caused major controversy over one of its designs. Back in February, there was an uproar over a turtleneck sweater that looked way too similar to blackface makeup. Also, it looks impractical and uncomfortable, but the main issue was the blackface.

View this post on Instagram

Fashion can’t seem to learn from its mistakes. Back in February 2018, dozens of iterations of the balaclava walked the @gucci runway in Milan. Based on vintage DIY knit ski masks, no one clocked them at the time for having any racist connotations…or maybe they went unnoticed among the layers and layers of styling. Rihanna even wore one version just a couple months later at Coachella. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Last night though, a knit black turtleneck balaclava with red cut-out lips resembling blackface that wasn’t on the runway, caught twitter’s attention…and Gucci’s almost immediately. Within a few hours, they pulled the sweater from sale and issued an apology. All things considered, it’s probably clear now that these brands are severely lacking the cultural context and knowledge to avoid these same pitfalls. If these global brands are serious about their commitment to increasing corporate diversity, it needs to happen at all levels and departments, not just the creative teams. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ • #gucci #skimask #fashion #knitwear #blackface #blackhistorymonth #luxury #luxurybrand #europeanfashion #turtleneck #balaclava #diy #knittingpattern #vintageknitting #pinterest #pinterestfail #rihanna #milanfashionweek #mfw #mfwss18 #ss18 #dietprada

A post shared by Diet Prada ™ (@diet_prada) on

In the wake of this scandal, Gucci immediately pulled the product from its site, and it issued what seemed like a very solid apology for what they had done. In his official statement about the controversy, the Gucci President and CEO acknowledged that the company was lacking “cultural diversity and awareness,” and committed to an ambitious plan to fix things. They announced that they were hiring “global and regional directors for diversity and inclusion,” as well as three different programs aimed at increasing representation and awareness moving forward.

View this post on Instagram

Gucci’s first four initiatives in a long-term plan of actions designed to further embed cultural diversity and awareness in the company.

A post shared by Gucci (@gucci) on

As opposed to some other companies and designers, who have been defensive and/or dismissive when responding to issues like this (looking at you, Dolce & Gabbana), it really seemed like Gucci got the issue, and was committed to fixing things in the future. With this most recent drama with the turban, now I’m not so sure. Gucci has yet to release a statement about the new controversy, but Nordstrom has changed the name of the item to “Head wrap” and says that it’s sold out. Sure, Jan.

This is definitely not the first time that a fashion brand has made a completely avoidable blunder like this, and I’m sure it won’t be the last. Just like we all know that it’s not appropriate to wear a Native American headdress to Coachella (I hope we all know this by now), brands like Gucci really should know better. Maybe now you’ll think twice before Instagramming that photo with your Gucci belt clearly visible.

Images: Getty Images; @Singhlions, @southernsikh / Twitter; @diet_prada, @gucci / Instagram